EMT and MET: necessary or permissive for metastasis?

Abstract

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and its reverse mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) have been suggested to play crucial roles in metastatic dissemination of carcinomas. These phenotypic transitions between states are not binary. Instead, carcinoma cells often exhibit a spectrum of epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype(s). While epithelial/mesenchymal plasticity has been observed preclinically and clinically, whether any of these phenotypic transitions are indispensable for metastatic outgrowth remains an unanswered question. Here, we focus on epithelial/mesenchymal plasticity in metastatic dissemination and propose alternative mechanisms for successful dissemination and metastases beyond the traditional EMT/MET view. We highlight multiple hypotheses that can help reconcile conflicting observations, and outline the next set of key questions that can offer valuable insights into mechanisms of metastasis in multiple tumor models.

Description
Advisor
Degree
Type
Journal article
Keywords
Citation

Jolly, Mohit Kumar, Ware, Kathryn E., Gilja, Shivee, et al.. "EMT and MET: necessary or permissive for metastasis?." Molecular Oncology, 11, no. 7 (2017) Wiley: 755-769. https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12083.

Has part(s)
Forms part of
Rights
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citable link to this page