Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues
| dc.citation.journalTitle | Breast Cancer Research | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dobbs, Jessica L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mueller, Jenna L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Krishnamurthy, Savitri | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shin, Dongsuk | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuerer, Henry | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yang, Wei | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramanujam, Nirmala | |
| dc.contributor.author | Richards-Kortum, Rebecca | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-02T07:05:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-02-02T07:05:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2017-02-02T07:05:09Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Introduction Pathologists currently diagnose breast lesions through histologic assessment, which requires fixation and tissue preparation. The diagnostic criteria used to classify breast lesions are qualitative and subjective, and inter-observer discordance has been shown to be a significant challenge in the diagnosis of selected breast lesions, particularly for borderline proliferative lesions. Thus, there is an opportunity to develop tools to rapidly visualize and quantitatively interpret breast tissue morphology for a variety of clinical applications. Methods Toward this end, we acquired images of freshly excised breast tissue specimens from a total of 34 patients using confocal fluorescence microscopy and proflavine as a topical stain. We developed computerized algorithms to segment and quantify nuclear and ductal parameters that characterize breast architectural features. A total of 33 parameters were evaluated and used as input to develop a decision tree model to classify benign and malignant breast tissue. Benign features were classified in tissue specimens acquired from 30 patients and malignant features were classified in specimens from 22 patients. Results The decision tree model that achieved the highest accuracy for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast features used the following parameters: standard deviation of inter-nuclear distance and number of duct lumens. The model achieved 81 % sensitivity and 93 % specificity, corresponding to an area under the curve of 0.93 and an overall accuracy of 90 %. The model classified IDC and DCIS with 92 % and 96 % accuracy, respectively. The cross-validated model achieved 75 % sensitivity and 93 % specificity and an overall accuracy of 88 %. Conclusions These results suggest that proflavine staining and confocal fluorescence microscopy combined with image analysis strategies to segment morphological features could potentially be used to quantitatively diagnose freshly obtained breast tissue at the point of care without the need for tissue preparation. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Dobbs, Jessica L., Mueller, Jenna L., Krishnamurthy, Savitri, et al.. "Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues." <i>Breast Cancer Research,</i> (2015) BioMed Central: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0617-9. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0617-9 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1911/93840 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central | |
| dc.rights | Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. | |
| dc.title | Micro-anatomical quantitative optical imaging: toward automated assessment of breast tissues | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| dc.type.dcmi | Text | |
| dc.type.publication | publisher version | |
| local.sword.agent | BioMed Central |