The rigid-plate and shrinking-plate hypotheses: Implications for the azimuths of transform faults

dc.citation.firstpage1827en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber8en_US
dc.citation.journalTitleTectonicsen_US
dc.citation.lastpage1842en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber35en_US
dc.contributor.authorMishra, Jay Kumaren_US
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Richard G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-21T14:34:17Zen_US
dc.date.available2017-08-21T14:34:17Zen_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.description.abstractThe rigid-plate hypothesis implies that oceanic lithosphere does not contract horizontally as it cools (hereinafter “rigid plate”). An alternative hypothesis, that vertically averaged tensional thermal stress in the competent lithosphere is fully relieved by horizontal thermal contraction (hereinafter “shrinking plate”), predicts subtly different azimuths for transform faults. The size of the predicted difference is as large as 2.44° with a mean and median of 0.46° and 0.31°, respectively, and changes sign between right-lateral (RL)-slipping and left-lateral (LL)-slipping faults. For the MORVEL transform-fault data set, all six plate pairs with both RL- and LL-slipping faults differ in the predicted sense, with the observed difference averaging 1.4° ± 0.9° (95% confidence limits), which is consistent with the predicted difference of 0.9°. The sum-squared normalized misfit, r, to global transform-fault azimuths is minimized for γ = 0.8 ± 0.4 (95% confidence limits), where γ is the fractional multiple of the predicted difference in azimuth between the shrinking-plate (γ = 1) and rigid-plate (γ = 0) hypotheses. Thus, observed transform azimuths differ significantly between RL-slipping and LL-slipping faults, which is inconsistent with the rigid-plate hypothesis but consistent with the shrinking-plate hypothesis, which indicates horizontal shrinking rates of 2% Ma−1 for newly created lithosphere, 1% Ma−1 for 0.1 Ma old lithosphere, 0.2% Ma−1 for 1 Ma old lithosphere, and 0.02% Ma−1 for 10 Ma old lithosphere, which are orders of magnitude higher than the mean intraplate seismic strain rate of ~10−6 Ma−1 (5 × 10−19 s−1).en_US
dc.identifier.citationMishra, Jay Kumar and Gordon, Richard G.. "The rigid-plate and shrinking-plate hypotheses: Implications for the azimuths of transform faults." <i>Tectonics,</i> 35, no. 8 (2016) Wiley: 1827-1842. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015TC003968.en_US
dc.identifier.digitalrigid-plate_and_shrinking-plate_hypothesesen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/2015TC003968en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/97384en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.titleThe rigid-plate and shrinking-plate hypotheses: Implications for the azimuths of transform faultsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.dcmiTexten_US
dc.type.publicationpublisher versionen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
rigid-plate.pdf
Size:
13.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format