Building consensus around the assessment and interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae diversity

Simple item page
dc.citation.articleNumbere15023en_US
dc.citation.journalTitlePeerJen_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber11en_US
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Sarah W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGamache, Matthew H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHowe-Kerr, Lauren I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKriefall, Nicola G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Andrew C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBanaszak, Anastazia T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBay, Line Kolinden_US
dc.contributor.authorBellantuono, Anthony J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, Debashishen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, Cheong Xinen_US
dc.contributor.authorClaar, Danielle C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCoffroth, Mary Aliceen_US
dc.contributor.authorCunning, Rossen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavy, Simon K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCampo, Javier delen_US
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Almeyda, Erika M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFrommlet, Jörg C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFuess, Lauren E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Pech, Raúl A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoulet, Tamar L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHoadley, Kenneth D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHowells, Emily J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHume, Benjamin C. C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKemp, Dustin W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKenkel, Carly D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKitchen, Sheila A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLaJeunesse, Todd C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Senjieen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcIlroy, Shelby E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcMinds, Ryanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNitschke, Matthew R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOakley, Clinton A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeixoto, Raquel S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPrada, Carlosen_US
dc.contributor.authorPutnam, Hollie M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorQuigley, Kateen_US
dc.contributor.authorReich, Hannah G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReimer, James Davisen_US
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Lanetty, Mauricioen_US
dc.contributor.authorRosales, Stephanie M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSaad, Osama S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSampayo, Eugenia M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Scott R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShoguchi, Eiichien_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Edward G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStat, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorStephens, Timothy G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStrader, Marie E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSuggett, David J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSwain, Timothy D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTran, Cawaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTraylor-Knowles, Nikkien_US
dc.contributor.authorVoolstra, Christian R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWarner, Mark E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeis, Virginia M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWright, Rachel M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorXiang, Tingtingen_US
dc.contributor.authorYamashita, Hiroshien_US
dc.contributor.authorZiegler, Marenen_US
dc.contributor.authorCorrea, Adrienne M. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorParkinson, John Everetten_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-21T16:13:58Zen_US
dc.date.available2023-07-21T16:13:58Zen_US
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.description.abstractWithin microeukaryotes, genetic variation and functional variation sometimes accumulate more quickly than morphological differences. To understand the evolutionary history and ecology of such lineages, it is key to examine diversity at multiple levels of organization. In the dinoflagellate family Symbiodiniaceae, which can form endosymbioses with cnidarians (e.g., corals, octocorals, sea anemones, jellyfish), other marine invertebrates (e.g., sponges, molluscs, flatworms), and protists (e.g., foraminifera), molecular data have been used extensively over the past three decades to describe phenotypes and to make evolutionary and ecological inferences. Despite advances in Symbiodiniaceae genomics, a lack of consensus among researchers with respect to interpreting genetic data has slowed progress in the field and acted as a barrier to reconciling observations. Here, we identify key challenges regarding the assessment and interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae genetic diversity across three levels: species, populations, and communities. We summarize areas of agreement and highlight techniques and approaches that are broadly accepted. In areas where debate remains, we identify unresolved issues and discuss technologies and approaches that can help to fill knowledge gaps related to genetic and phenotypic diversity. We also discuss ways to stimulate progress, in particular by fostering a more inclusive and collaborative research community. We hope that this perspective will inspire and accelerate coral reef science by serving as a resource to those designing experiments, publishing research, and applying for funding related to Symbiodiniaceae and their symbiotic partnerships.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDavies, Sarah W., Gamache, Matthew H., Howe-Kerr, Lauren I., et al.. "Building consensus around the assessment and interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae diversity." <i>PeerJ,</i> 11, (2023) PeerJ, Inc: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15023.en_US
dc.identifier.digitalpeerj-15023en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/115006en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPeerJ, Incen_US
dc.rightsExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.  Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the work beyond the terms of the license or beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.titleBuilding consensus around the assessment and interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae diversityen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.dcmiTexten_US
dc.type.publicationpublisher versionen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
peerj-15023.pdf
Size:
5.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Faculty Publications
BioSciences Publications