Some unpleasant bargaining arithmetic?

dc.citation.journalTitleJournal of Economic Theoryen_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber171en_US
dc.contributor.authorEraslan, Hülyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMerlo, Antonioen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-17T14:39:05Zen_US
dc.date.available2017-11-17T14:39:05Zen_US
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.description.abstractIt is commonly believed that voting rules that are relatively more inclusive (e.g., unanimity or supermajority), are likely to yield relatively more equitable outcomes than simple-majority rule. We show that this is not necessarily the case in bargaining environments. We study a multilateral bargaining model à la Baron and Ferejohn (1989), where players are heterogeneous with respect to the potential surplus they bring to the bargaining table. We show that unanimity rule may generate equilibrium outcomes that are more unequal (or less equitable) than under majority rule. In fact, as players become relatively more patient, we show that the more inclusive the voting rule, the less equitable the equilibrium allocations.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEraslan, Hülya and Merlo, Antonio. "Some unpleasant bargaining arithmetic?." <i>Journal of Economic Theory,</i> 171, (2017) Elsevier: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2017.08.004.en_US
dc.identifier.digitalinequality_20170412en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2017.08.004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/98839en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsThis is an author's peer-reviewed final manuscript, as accepted by the publisher. The published article is copyrighted by Elsevier.en_US
dc.subject.keywordMultilateral bargainingen_US
dc.subject.keywordVoting rulesen_US
dc.subject.keywordInequalityen_US
dc.titleSome unpleasant bargaining arithmetic?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.type.dcmiTexten_US
dc.type.publicationpost-printen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
inequality_20170412.pdf
Size:
343.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format