BioSciences at Rice
Permanent URI for this community
On July 1st, 2014 the departments of Biochemistry & Cell Biology (BCB) and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology (EEB) merged to form BioSciences at Rice. This merger unites faculty engaged in research and teaching in a wide range of disciplines throughout the life sciences, creating a vibrant and diverse community of scholars and educators housed within a single department. Learn more about the department at http://biosciences.rice.edu/default.aspx.
Browse
Browsing BioSciences at Rice by Author "Ahumada, Jorge A."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Consistent diel activity patterns of forest mammals among tropical regions(Springer Nature, 2022) Vallejo-Vargas, Andrea F.; Sheil, Douglas; Semper-Pascual, Asunción; Beaudrot, Lydia; Ahumada, Jorge A.; Akampurira, Emmanuel; Bitariho, Robert; Espinosa, Santiago; Estienne, Vittoria; Jansen, Patrick A.; Kayijamahe, Charles; Martin, Emanuel H.; Lima, Marcela Guimarães Moreira; Mugerwa, Badru; Rovero, Francesco; Salvador, Julia; Santos, Fernanda; Spironello, Wilson Roberto; Uzabaho, Eustrate; Bischof, Richard; Program in Ecology & Evolutionary BiologyAn animal’s daily use of time (their “diel activity”) reflects their adaptations, requirements, and interactions, yet we know little about the underlying processes governing diel activity within and among communities. Here we examine whether community-level activity patterns differ among biogeographic regions, and explore the roles of top-down versus bottom-up processes and thermoregulatory constraints. Using data from systematic camera-trap networks in 16 protected forests across the tropics, we examine the relationships of mammals’ diel activity to body mass and trophic guild. Also, we assess the activity relationships within and among guilds. Apart from Neotropical insectivores, guilds exhibited consistent cross-regional activity in relation to body mass. Results indicate that thermoregulation constrains herbivore and insectivore activity (e.g., larger Afrotropical herbivores are ~7 times more likely to be nocturnal than smaller herbivores), while bottom-up processes constrain the activity of carnivores in relation to herbivores, and top-down processes constrain the activity of small omnivores and insectivores in relation to large carnivores’ activity. Overall, diel activity of tropical mammal communities appears shaped by similar processes and constraints among regions reflecting body mass and trophic guilds.Item Occupancy winners in tropical protected forests: a pantropical analysis(The Royal Society, 2022) Semper-Pascual, Asunción; Bischof, Richard; Milleret, Cyril; Beaudrot, Lydia; Vallejo-Vargas, Andrea F.; Ahumada, Jorge A.; Akampurira, Emmanuel; Bitariho, Robert; Espinosa, Santiago; Jansen, Patrick A.; Kiebou-Opepa, Cisquet; Moreira Lima, Marcela Guimarães; Martin, Emanuel H.; Mugerwa, Badru; Rovero, Francesco; Salvador, Julia; Santos, Fernanda; Uzabaho, Eustrate; Sheil, Douglas; Program in Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyThe structure of forest mammal communities appears surprisingly consistent across the continental tropics, presumably due to convergent evolution in similar environments. Whether such consistency extends to mammal occupancy, despite variation in species characteristics and context, remains unclear. Here we ask whether we can predict occupancy patterns and, if so, whether these relationships are consistent across biogeographic regions. Specifically, we assessed how mammal feeding guild, body mass and ecological specialization relate to occupancy in protected forests across the tropics. We used standardized camera-trap data (1002 camera-trap locations and 2–10 years of data) and a hierarchical Bayesian occupancy model. We found that occupancy varied by regions, and certain species characteristics explained much of this variation. Herbivores consistently had the highest occupancy. However, only in the Neotropics did we detect a significant effect of body mass on occupancy: large mammals had lowest occupancy. Importantly, habitat specialists generally had higher occupancy than generalists, though this was reversed in the Indo-Malayan sites. We conclude that habitat specialization is key for understanding variation in mammal occupancy across regions, and that habitat specialists often benefit more from protected areas, than do generalists. The contrasting examples seen in the Indo-Malayan region probably reflect distinct anthropogenic pressures.