Strategic Obfuscation through Bureaucratic Delegation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorMartin, Lanny W.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStevenson, Randolph T.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCarroll, Royce A.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLewis, Steven W.
dc.creatorLoftis, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-22T19:53:44Z
dc.date.available2014-09-22T19:53:44Z
dc.date.created2014-05
dc.date.issued2014-04-25
dc.date.submittedMay 2014
dc.date.updated2014-09-22T19:53:44Z
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation, I develop and test a theory of when politicians delegate more policy making responsibility to bureaucrats. Since minimizing blame for bad policy outcomes and claiming credit for good ones is a constant concern for politicians, the aim of reelection means it is preferable for politicians to distance themselves from policies that will be unpopular. For this reason, delegating power to bureaucrats has long been suspected of letting politicians shift responsibility for policies voters do not prefer. I move forward our understanding of this feature of democratic politics with a detailed formal theoretical model, from which I derive new empirical expectations. I test these in the contexts of both Western and Eastern Europe, drawing on unique features of the European Union policy harmonization process to build large cross-national datasets of policy making. I use the theoretical framework to explain how political corruption in Central and Eastern Europe, combined with political control over bureaucrats, gives politicians an incentive to make policy more discretionary to obscure political responsibility. Then, I apply the theory to explain how coalition governments in Western European parliamentary democracies use bureaucratic delegation to achieve cooperation between ruling parties discreetly, to avoid attracting voters' attention to compromise policies. The findings reveal support for the theoretical model and new insights on how the dynamics of coalition government and the cabinet's policy prerogatives in parliamentary democracies affect the transparency of the policy-making process, opportunities for corruption, and political control of policy outcomes.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationLoftis, Matthew. "Strategic Obfuscation through Bureaucratic Delegation." (2014) Diss., Rice University. <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/1911/77214">https://hdl.handle.net/1911/77214</a>.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/77214
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author, unless otherwise indicated. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the work beyond the bounds of fair use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.
dc.subjectAccountability
dc.subjectDelegation
dc.subjectComparative politics
dc.titleStrategic Obfuscation through Bureaucratic Delegation
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialText
thesis.degree.departmentPolitical Science
thesis.degree.disciplineSocial Sciences
thesis.degree.grantorRice University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LOFTIS-DOCUMENT-2014.pdf
Size:
4.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
2.6 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt
Size:
5.83 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
Collections
Rice University Electronic Theses and Dissertations