NAFTA Does Not Matter as Much as You Think (But Renegotiation Matters a Lot)

Simple item page
dc.citation.issueNumber06.19.17
dc.citation.journalTitleIssue Brief
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Russell A.
dc.contributor.authorPayan, Tony
dc.contributor.orgJames A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-06T18:17:06Z
dc.date.available2017-10-06T18:17:06Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.descriptionMost analysis of NAFTA begins by citing the huge increase in bilateral trade between the U.S., Canada and Mexico since 1993. U.S.-Mexico trade—exports plus imports—has grown three and a half times faster than U.S. GDP since NAFTA began in 1994. If NAFTA were solely responsible for that trade, renegotiating it on more favorable terms might have big payoffs. However, there are seven problems with thinking NAFTA has mattered or can matter very much.
dc.identifier.citationGreen, Russell A. and Payan, Tony. "NAFTA Does Not Matter as Much as You Think (But Renegotiation Matters a Lot)." <i>Issue Brief,</i> no. 06.19.17 (2017) James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy;Baylor College of Medicine: <a href="https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/nafta-does-not-matter-as-much-as-you-think/">https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/nafta-does-not-matter-as-much-as-you-think/</a>.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/97768
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJames A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy;Baylor College of Medicine
dc.rightsThis material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice Universityﾒs Baker Institute for Public Policy.
dc.titleNAFTA Does Not Matter as Much as You Think (But Renegotiation Matters a Lot)
dc.typeReport
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BI-Brief-061917-NAFTA.pdf
Size:
493.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Baker Institute Publications