The Influence of Employee Inkings on Consumer Behavior: Booed, Eschewed, and Tattooed

dc.contributor.advisorHebl, Michelle R.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBeier, Margaret E.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberOswald, Frederick L.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSmith, D. Brent
dc.creatorRuggs, Enrica
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-16T16:37:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-16T16:37:35Z
dc.date.available2013-09-16T16:37:30Z
dc.date.available2013-09-16T16:37:35Z
dc.date.created2013-05
dc.date.issued2013-09-16
dc.date.submittedMay 2013
dc.date.updated2013-09-16T16:37:35Z
dc.description.abstractOne trend that is becoming overwhelmingly popular in mainstream America, particularly among the youth (prior to and as they enter the workforce) is getting tattoos (Armstrong, Owen, Roberts, & Koch, 2002; Chivers, 2002; Laumann & Derick, 2006), yet there is little empirical evidence on the impact of having tattoos in an employment context. The current dissertation sought to understand this impact by examining the influence of employee tattoos on customers’ stereotypical perceptions, attitudes toward the employee, organization, and products, and behavior toward the employee and organization across two studies. In the first study, customers viewed a marketing video in which the employee either had a visible tattoo or not. Customers reported more stereotypical perceptions of tattooed (versus nontattooed) employees, such that they perceived the tattooed employee as possessing more artistic traits, having a less favorable appearance, and being risker. Stereotypical perceptions of artistic traits were the strongest, and these perceptions mediated the relation between tattoo presence and evaluations of the employee, organization, and product. In a second field study, employees (who either had a tattoo or not) sold restaurant cards to customers at a convention to raise money for a charity organization. Results showed that customers engaged in more avoidance behaviors with tattooed (versus) nontattooed employees; however, there were no significant differences in purchasing behavior based on tattoo presence. The results of both studies provide insight into a mechanism for how tattoo presence impacts customers’ reactions to employees, organizations, and products. Implications and future research ideas are discussed.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationRuggs, Enrica. "The Influence of Employee Inkings on Consumer Behavior: Booed, Eschewed, and Tattooed." (2013) Diss., Rice University. <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/1911/72035">https://hdl.handle.net/1911/72035</a>.
dc.identifier.slug123456789/ETD-2013-05-445
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/72035
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author, unless otherwise indicated. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the work beyond the bounds of fair use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.
dc.subjectStigma
dc.subjectDiscrimination
dc.subjectConsumer behavior
dc.subjectTattoos
dc.titleThe Influence of Employee Inkings on Consumer Behavior: Booed, Eschewed, and Tattooed
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialText
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology
thesis.degree.disciplineSocial Sciences
thesis.degree.grantorRice University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RUGGS-THESIS.pdf
Size:
5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: