The Influence of Employee Inkings on Consumer Behavior: Booed, Eschewed, and Tattooed

dc.contributor.advisorHebl, Michelle R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBeier, Margaret E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberOswald, Frederick L.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSmith, D. Brenten_US
dc.creatorRuggs, Enricaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-16T16:37:30Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-16T16:37:35Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-09-16T16:37:30Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-09-16T16:37:35Zen_US
dc.date.created2013-05en_US
dc.date.issued2013-09-16en_US
dc.date.submittedMay 2013en_US
dc.date.updated2013-09-16T16:37:35Zen_US
dc.description.abstractOne trend that is becoming overwhelmingly popular in mainstream America, particularly among the youth (prior to and as they enter the workforce) is getting tattoos (Armstrong, Owen, Roberts, & Koch, 2002; Chivers, 2002; Laumann & Derick, 2006), yet there is little empirical evidence on the impact of having tattoos in an employment context. The current dissertation sought to understand this impact by examining the influence of employee tattoos on customers’ stereotypical perceptions, attitudes toward the employee, organization, and products, and behavior toward the employee and organization across two studies. In the first study, customers viewed a marketing video in which the employee either had a visible tattoo or not. Customers reported more stereotypical perceptions of tattooed (versus nontattooed) employees, such that they perceived the tattooed employee as possessing more artistic traits, having a less favorable appearance, and being risker. Stereotypical perceptions of artistic traits were the strongest, and these perceptions mediated the relation between tattoo presence and evaluations of the employee, organization, and product. In a second field study, employees (who either had a tattoo or not) sold restaurant cards to customers at a convention to raise money for a charity organization. Results showed that customers engaged in more avoidance behaviors with tattooed (versus) nontattooed employees; however, there were no significant differences in purchasing behavior based on tattoo presence. The results of both studies provide insight into a mechanism for how tattoo presence impacts customers’ reactions to employees, organizations, and products. Implications and future research ideas are discussed.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationRuggs, Enrica. "The Influence of Employee Inkings on Consumer Behavior: Booed, Eschewed, and Tattooed." (2013) Diss., Rice University. <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/1911/72035">https://hdl.handle.net/1911/72035</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.slug123456789/ETD-2013-05-445en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/72035en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author, unless otherwise indicated. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the work beyond the bounds of fair use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.en_US
dc.subjectStigmaen_US
dc.subjectDiscriminationen_US
dc.subjectConsumer behavioren_US
dc.subjectTattoosen_US
dc.titleThe Influence of Employee Inkings on Consumer Behavior: Booed, Eschewed, and Tattooeden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.materialTexten_US
thesis.degree.departmentPsychologyen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineSocial Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.grantorRice Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RUGGS-THESIS.pdf
Size:
5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: