Lacking a Voice: Bias against Women as Academic Speakers at Top Universities

dc.contributor.advisorHebl, Michelleen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberOswald, Freden_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBeier, Margareten_US
dc.creatorNittrouer, Christine Lynnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-05T15:14:13Zen_US
dc.date.available2016-02-05T15:14:13Zen_US
dc.date.created2015-12en_US
dc.date.issued2015-12-04en_US
dc.date.submittedDecember 2015en_US
dc.date.updated2016-02-05T15:14:13Zen_US
dc.description.abstractAcross a wide range of settings, women still face disparities in the workplace relative to men, even in seemingly equitable professions like academia (Moss-Racusin, Dovidio, Brescoll, Graham, & Handelsman, 2012). In the current research, I conduct five studies focusing on academia in more detail and specifically examining how gatekeeping or gender biases might influence the research presentations that are heard throughout top academic institutions. Specifically, Study 1 uses archival data to examine colloquia speakers who gave talks in six academic disciplines within the top 50 U.S. colleges and universities. Results shows that women are significantly less likely to be colloquia speakers than are men, even after taking into account the differential number of men and women who get their PhDs and hold academic positions. To eliminate alternative explanations (e.g., women are declining invitations more often than are men), Study 2 is conducted (with a faculty sample). Results reveal no gender preferences. Then, Study 3 (with a convenience sample) and Study 4 (with a faculty sample) examine individuals’ ratings of manipulated “potential speakers.” Results from Study 3 demonstrate a preference for women when they talk about communal topics and a denigration of women when they talk about agentic topics. Results from Study 4 indicate no preference for women or men. Finally, Study 5 examines whether such differences arise from individual or group decisions, and are more likely when women are present in gatekeeping roles (help decide speakers). As a whole, this research strongly shows that those who invite and schedule speakers are gatekeepers and can create (or avoid) gender bias, and I discuss strategies to make them more aware and vigilant about ensuring more equal distributions of speakers by gender.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationNittrouer, Christine Lynn. "Lacking a Voice: Bias against Women as Academic Speakers at Top Universities." (2015) Master’s Thesis, Rice University. <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/1911/88378">https://hdl.handle.net/1911/88378</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/88378en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author, unless otherwise indicated. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the work beyond the bounds of fair use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.en_US
dc.subjectgenderen_US
dc.subjectbiasen_US
dc.subjectgatekeepingen_US
dc.subjectcolloquiaen_US
dc.subjectselectionen_US
dc.subjectpsychologyen_US
dc.titleLacking a Voice: Bias against Women as Academic Speakers at Top Universitiesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.materialTexten_US
thesis.degree.departmentPsychologyen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineSocial Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.grantorRice Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Artsen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
NITTROUER-DOCUMENT-2015.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt
Size:
5.85 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
2.61 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: