My dissertation centers around themes of trust and truth within the context of Czech science in order to, ultimately, join literature on the relation between liberalism, individualism, and empiricism. By depicting the ways that personal experiences figure into the production of scientific facts for my interlocutors, it shows how, in contrast with the normative ideal, conceptions of scientific objectivity can be constructed from appeals to subjectivity. Importantly, I ground my findings squarely within the anthropology of science, a literature that recognizes scientists and scientific inquiry as contingently and reciprocally swept up in social currents – in this case, those of a post-socialist, nascent liberal society. In doing so, my project offers a unique vantage toward Central Europe, a region that lays complexly within multiple junctures. I rewrite the narrative of the region, drawing strange parallels between socialist-era dissidents’ hopeful appeals for “living in truth,” and contemporary illiberal populists’ angry renunciation of expertise, for example. Locating my ethnographic findings within such contexts, my dissertation argues that liberalism’s multiple and conflicting meanings, from the agreement of a social contract to the celebration of liberty and the marketplace of ideas, blasts open space for a far greater range of practices than has been traditionally appreciated.