Galvestonians and military reconstruction, 1865-1867

dc.contributor.advisorVandiver, Frank E.
dc.creatorShannon, Stephen Franklin
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-18T21:26:16Z
dc.date.available2018-12-18T21:26:16Z
dc.date.issued1975
dc.description.abstractTraditional literature on reconstruction in Texas considers the period as one in which democratic institutions such as home rule are abused and pre-empted by a hostile military authority. By the citation of specific instances and by implication historians paint a tragic image in which local government is rendered feeble, local officeholders are removed without the consent of their constituents, civil courts are attacked, and Texans are left to the mercy of a vengeful conqueror. Such general statements cannot be applied to Galveston, the headquarters of the army of occupation from 1865 through 1867. At the outset of the period islanders found the army command to be extremely solicitous of the needs of whites in reference to the labor situation and of the maintenance of local government. Any official disputes that arose were based on jurisdictional conflicts that were speedily resolved. The army actually lent strength to local provisional government by incorporating it into the military regime. Wholesale removals of personnel did not occur, nor was the insular society upon which government rested disoriented in any way. Both army and local government cooperated to police freedmen and to keep them productive. The only Federal authority that consistently confronted local government in behalf of freedmen was the Freedmen*s Bureau. This agency realized only minimal success in aiding the island's blacks, for necessary support from the regular army was not always present and islanders were naturally hostile to any power that threatened to modify the labor situation. Islanders learned that divisions within the reconstructing powers might be exploited to their advantage. By late 1866 a renewed confidence to resist reconstruction policy had developed on the island so that an overt confrontation ensued after the appointment of a district commander dedicated to the impartial administration of justice. The difference in attitude between this commander and his predecessors appeared to give substance to a charge of "military despotism." Despite various conflicts with the local population, however, this district commander did not remove local officials at random nor did he seek to disfranchise as many white islanders as possible. Local government continued to exercise its usual powers. Galvestonians, therefore, were not deprived of control of their own local institutions nor were they denied participation in government more stringently than required by Congressional acts. They did, in fact, blend a remnant of Confederate authority into reconstruction government, re-establish their economic regime with free black labor, and develop a strong will to resist further reconstruction programs.
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digital
dc.format.extent286 pp
dc.identifier.callnoThesis Hist. 1975 Shannon
dc.identifier.citationShannon, Stephen Franklin. "Galvestonians and military reconstruction, 1865-1867." (1975) Master’s Thesis, Rice University. <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/1911/104594">https://hdl.handle.net/1911/104594</a>.
dc.identifier.digitalRICE2229
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/104594
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author, unless otherwise indicated. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the work beyond the bounds of fair use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.
dc.titleGalvestonians and military reconstruction, 1865-1867
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialText
thesis.degree.departmentHistory
thesis.degree.disciplineHumanities
thesis.degree.grantorRice University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RICE2229.pdf
Size:
14.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format