Usability of New Electronic Voting Systems and Traditional Methods: Comparisons Between Sequential and Direct Access Electronic Voting Interfaces, Paper Ballots, Punch Cards, and Lever Machines

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorByme, Michael D.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKortum, Philip T.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLane, David M.
dc.creatorGreene, Kristen K.
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-18T21:34:59Z
dc.date.available2018-12-18T21:34:59Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractIt has been assumed that new Direct-Recording Electronic voting machines (DREs) are superior to the older systems they are replacing, despite a lack of supporting research. The current studies contribute much-needed data on the usability of both older and newer voting systems. Study 1 compared a DRE with a sequential navigation model to paper ballots, punch cards, and lever machines; a DRE with a direct access navigation model was added in Study 2. Changing the navigation style from sequential to direct decreased voter satisfaction and greatly increased undervote errors and intentional abstentions. Premature ballot casting was seen with the direct DRE only. Across both studies, participants were neither faster nor less error-prone with the DREs than the older methods. Nonetheless, they found the sequential DRE significantly more satisfying, an interesting disassociation between preference and performance. Despite voter preferences, the assumption that DREs are superior may be unfounded.
dc.format.digitalOriginreformatted digital
dc.format.extent68 pp
dc.identifier.callnono call number
dc.identifier.citationGreene, Kristen K.. "Usability of New Electronic Voting Systems and Traditional Methods: Comparisons Between Sequential and Direct Access Electronic Voting Interfaces, Paper Ballots, Punch Cards, and Lever Machines." (2008) Master’s Thesis, Rice University. <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/1911/104908">https://hdl.handle.net/1911/104908</a>.
dc.identifier.digitalRICE2557
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/104908
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author, unless otherwise indicated. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the work beyond the bounds of fair use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.
dc.titleUsability of New Electronic Voting Systems and Traditional Methods: Comparisons Between Sequential and Direct Access Electronic Voting Interfaces, Paper Ballots, Punch Cards, and Lever Machines
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialText
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology
thesis.degree.disciplineSocial Sciences
thesis.degree.grantorRice University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RICE2557.pdf
Size:
2.8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Rice University Electronic Theses and Dissertations