Prioritize Both Engineered and Natural Solutions for Effective GHG Mitigation

dc.contributor.authorMedlock, Kenneth B. IIIen_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Keilyen_US
dc.contributor.orgJames A. Baker III Institute for Public Policyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-05T16:04:56Zen_US
dc.date.available2023-04-05T16:04:56Zen_US
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationMedlock, Kenneth B. III and Miller, Keily. "Prioritize Both Engineered and Natural Solutions for Effective GHG Mitigation." <i>Baker Institute Policy Brief,</i> 01.22.21, (2021) James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy: https://doi.org/10.25613/SGDV-1557.en_US
dc.identifier.digitalbi-brief-012221-ces-mitigationen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25613/SGDV-1557en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/114563en_US
dc.publisherJames A. Baker III Institute for Public Policyen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policyen_US
dc.titlePrioritize Both Engineered and Natural Solutions for Effective GHG Mitigationen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
dc.type.dcmiTexten_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
bi-brief-012221-ces-mitigation.pdf
Size:
628.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format