Browsing by Author "Zhu, Yuhui"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of finite element modeling methods for predicting compression screw failure in a custom pelvic implant
    (Frontiers Media S.A., 2024) Zhu, Yuhui; Babazadeh-Naseri, Ata; Brake, Matthew R. W.; Akin, John E.; Li, Geng; Lewis, Valerae O.; Fregly, Benjamin J.
    Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D)-printed custom pelvic implants have become a clinically viable option for patients undergoing pelvic cancer surgery with resection of the hip joint. However, increased clinical utilization has also necessitated improved implant durability, especially with regard to the compression screws used to secure the implant to remaining pelvic bone. This study evaluated six different finite element (FE) screw modeling methods for predicting compression screw pullout and fatigue failure in a custom pelvic implant secured to bone using nine compression screws. Methods: Three modeling methods (tied constraints (TIE), bolt load with constant force (BL-CF), and bolt load with constant length (BL-CL)) generated screw axial forces using functionality built into Abaqus FE software; while the remaining three modeling methods (isotropic pseudo-thermal field (ISO), orthotropic pseudo-thermal field (ORT), and equal-and-opposite force field (FOR)) generated screw axial forces using iterative physics-based relationships that can be implemented in any FE software. The ability of all six modeling methods to match specified screw pretension forces and predict screw pullout and fatigue failure was evaluated using an FE model of a custom pelvic implant with total hip replacement. The applied hip contact forces in the FE model were estimated at two locations in a gait cycle. For each of the nine screws in the custom implant FE model, likelihood of screw pullout failure was predicted using maximum screw axial force, while likelihood of screw fatigue failure was predicted using maximum von Mises stress. Results: The three iterative physics-based modeling methods and the non-iterative Abaqus BL-CL method produced nearly identical predictions for likelihood of screw pullout and fatigue failure, while the other two built-in Abaqus modeling methods yielded vastly different predictions. However, the Abaqus BL-CL method required the least computation time, largely because an iterative process was not needed to induce specified screw pretension forces. Of the three iterative methods, FOR required the fewest iterations and thus the least computation time. Discussion: These findings suggest that the BL-CL screw modeling method is the best option when Abaqus is used for predicting screw pullout and fatigue failure in custom pelvis prostheses, while the iterative physics-based FOR method is the best option if FE software other than Abaqus is used.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Finite element analysis of screw fixation durability under multiple boundary and loading conditions for a custom pelvic implant
    (Elsevier, 2023) Zhu, Yuhui; Babazadeh-Naseri, Ata; Dunbar, Nicholas J.; Brake, Matthew R.W.; Zandiyeh, Payam; Li, Geng; Leardini, Alberto; Spazzoli, Benedetta; Fregly, Benjamin J.
    Despite showing promising functional outcomes for pelvic reconstruction after sarcoma resection, custom-made pelvic implants continue to exhibit high complication rates due to fixation failures. Patient-specific finite element models have been utilized by researchers to evaluate implant durability. However, the effect of assumed boundary and loading conditions on failure analysis results of fixation screws remains unknown. In this study, the postoperative stress distributions in the fixation screws of a state-of-the-art custom-made pelvic implant were simulated, and the risk of failure was estimated under various combinations of two bone-implant interaction models (tied vs. frictional contact) and four load cases from level-ground walking and stair activities. The study found that the average weighted peak von Mises stress could increase by 22-fold when the bone-implant interactions were modeled with a frictional contact model instead of a tied model, and the likelihood of fatigue and pullout failure for each screw could change dramatically when different combinations of boundary and loading conditions were used. The inclusion of additional boundary and loading conditions led to a more reliable analysis of fixation durability. These findings demonstrated the importance of simulating multiple boundary conditions and load cases for comprehensive implant design evaluation using finite element analysis.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemUnknown
    Inclusion of Muscle Forces Affects Finite Element Prediction of Compression Screw Pullout but Not Fatigue Failure in a Custom Pelvic Implant
    (MDPI, 2024) Zhu, Yuhui; Babazadeh-Naseri, Ata; Brake, Matthew R. W.; Akin, John E.; Li, Geng; Lewis, Valerae O.; Fregly, Benjamin J.
    Custom implants used for pelvic reconstruction in pelvic sarcoma surgery face a high complication rate due to mechanical failures of fixation screws. Consequently, patient-specific finite element (FE) models have been employed to analyze custom pelvic implant durability. However, muscle forces have often been omitted from FE studies of the post-operative pelvis with a custom implant, despite the lack of evidence that this omission has minimal impact on predicted bone, implant, and fixation screw stress distributions. This study investigated the influence of muscle forces on FE predictions of fixation screw pullout and fatigue failure in a custom pelvic implant. Specifically, FE analyses were conducted using a patient-specific FE model loaded with seven sets of personalized muscle and hip joint contact force loading conditions estimated using a personalized neuromusculoskeletal (NMS) model. Predictions of fixation screw pullout and fatigue failure—quantified by simulated screw axial forces and von Mises stresses, respectively—were compared between analyses with and without personalized muscle forces. The study found that muscle forces had a considerable influence on predicted screw pullout but not fatigue failure. However, it remains unclear whether including or excluding muscle forces would yield more conservative predictions of screw failures. Furthermore, while the effect of muscle forces on predicted screw failures was location-dependent for cortical screws, no clear location dependency was observed for cancellous screws. These findings support the combined use of patient-specific FE and NMS models, including loading from muscle forces, when predicting screw pullout but not fatigue failure in custom pelvic implants.