Browsing by Author "Zhang, Tuo"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Bounds on geologically current rates of motion of groups of hot spots(Wiley, 2017) Wang, Chengzu; Gordon, Richard G.; Zhang, TuoIt is widely believed that groups of hot spots in different regions of the world are in relative motion at rates of 10 to 30 mm a−1 or more. Here we present a new method for analyzing geologically current motion between groups of hot spots beneath different plates. In an inversion of 56 globally distributed, equally weighted trends of hot spot tracks, the dispersion is dominated by differences in trend between different plates rather than differences within plates. Nonetheless the rate of hot spot motion perpendicular to the direction of absolute plate motion, vperp, differs significantly from zero for only 3 of 10 plates and then by merely 0.3 to 1.4 mm a−1. The global mean upper bound on |vperp| is 3.2 ± 2.7 mm a−1. Therefore, hot spots move slowly and can be used to define a global reference frame for plate motions.Item The Malpelo Plate Hypothesis and implications for nonclosure of the Cocos-Nazca-Pacific plate motion circuit(Wiley, 2017) Zhang, Tuo; Gordon, Richard G.; Mishra, Jay K.; Wang, ChengzuUsing global multiresolution topography, we estimate new transform-fault azimuths along the Cocos-Nazca plate boundary and show that the direction of relative plate motion is 3.3° ± 1.8° (95% confidence limits) clockwise of prior estimates. The new direction of Cocos-Nazca plate motion is, moreover, 4.9° ± 2.7° (95% confidence limits) clockwise of the azimuth of the Panama transform fault. We infer that the plate east of the Panama transform fault is not the Nazca plate but instead is a microplate that we term the Malpelo plate. With the improved transform-fault data, the nonclosure of the Nazca-Cocos-Pacific plate motion circuit is reduced from 15.0 mm a−1 ± 3.8 mm a−1 to 11.6 mm a−1 ± 3.8 mm a−1 (95% confidence limits). The nonclosure seems too large to be due entirely to horizontal thermal contraction of oceanic lithosphere and suggests that one or more additional plate boundaries remain to be discovered.Item Oblique Seafloor Spreading, the Malpelo Plate Hypothesis, and Cocos-Nazca-Pacific Plate Motion Circuit(2018-11-16) Zhang, Tuo; Gordon, Richard GWe show that oblique seafloor spreading occurs in several regions where obliquity, α, was not recognized before. These include the slow spreading centers of the Red Sea (α≈20°), intermediate spreading centers of the Cocos-Nazca plate boundary between 91°W and 94°W (α≈9°), and superfast spreading centers of the East Pacific Rise at the Nazca-Pacific plate boundary between 29°S and 32°S (α≈10°) and perhaps between ≈16°S and ≈22°S (α≈4°). Thus, oblique spreading occurs across slow, intermediate, and superfast spreading centers, but not across fast spreading centers. Across slow and intermediate spreading centers, obliquity tends to decrease with increasing spreading rate, while across fast and superfast spreading centers it tends to increase with increasing spreading rate. Oblique spreading at intermediate and superfast spreading centers may be related to magma overpressure or to unusual directions of remote tectonic stress or to ongoing plate boundary reorganizations or to some combination of these. We show along a segment of the Cocos-Pacific plate boundary that inferred magma overpressure is only one-fourth as large as remote tectonic stress, consistent with a prior inference from other observations. The highest obliquity occurs along ridge segments lying 200 km to 1500 km from a mantle plume, but not all ridge segments near plumes spread obliquely. For one set of estimates of plume fluxes, the rate of plume flux delivered to ridges correlates positively and significantly with spreading rate. Using global multi-resolution topography, we estimate new transform-fault azimuths along the eastern Cocos-Nazca plate boundary and show that the direction of relative plate motion is 3.3° ±1.8° (95% confidence limits) clockwise of prior estimates. The new direction of Cocos-Nazca plate motion is, moreover, 4.9° ±2.7° (95% confidence limits) clockwise of the azimuth of the Panama transform fault. We infer that the plate east of the Panama transform fault is not the Nazca plate, but instead is a microplate that we term the Malpelo plate. With the improved transform fault data, the non-closure of the Nazca-Cocos-Pacific plate-motion circuit is reduced from 15.0 mm a–1 ±3.8 mm a–1 to 11.6 mm a–1 ±3.8 mm a–1 (95% confidence limits). Last, we examine the closure of the Cocos-Nazca-Pacific plate motion circuit, which were previously shown to fail closure by a linear velocity of 11.6 mm a–1 ±3.8 mm a–1. We tested eliminating the spreading rates along the Cocos-Pacific plate boundary north of the Orozco transform fault. The non-closure velocity is reduced to 9.9 mm a–1 ±3.8 mm a–1 (95% confidence limits). By further replacing the spreading rates with those from NUVEL plate motion model [DeMets et al., 1990] and keeping the new transform fault azimuth estimates, the non-closure velocity is reduced to 8.2 mm a–1 ±3.8 mm a–1 (95% confidence limits), which indicates significant non-closure. Finally, we tested further by eliminating both the spreading rates and transform faults along the traditionally defined Cocos-Nazca plate boundary east of the Galapagos transform fault, the non-closure velocity is reduced to 4.2 mm a–1 ±3.8 mm a–1 (95% confidence limits), which is insignificant. This result indicates that the plate boundary east of the Galapagos Transform Fault does not record motion between the Cocos and Nazca plate. Instead it records motion between a previously unrecognized plate and either the Cocos or Nazca plate.