Browsing by Author "Wang, Qianxia"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An empirical model of proton RBE based on the linear correlation between x-ray and proton radiosensitivity
    (Wiley, 2022) Flint, David B.; Ruff, Chase E.; Bright, Scott J.; Yepes, Pablo; Wang, Qianxia; Manandhar, Mandira; Kacem, Mariam Ben; Turner, Broderick X.; Martinus, David K. J.; Shaitelman, Simona F.; Sawakuchi, Gabriel O.
    Background Proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is known to depend on physical factors of the proton beam, such as its linear energy transfer (LET), as well as on cell-line specific biological factors, such as their ability to repair DNA damage. However, in a clinical setting, proton RBE is still considered to have a fixed value of 1.1 despite the existence of several empirical models that can predict proton RBE based on how a cell's survival curve (linear-quadratic model [LQM]) parameters α and β vary with the LET of the proton beam. Part of the hesitation to incorporate variable RBE models in the clinic is due to the great noise in the biological datasets on which these models are trained, often making it unclear which model, if any, provides sufficiently accurate RBE predictions to warrant a departure from RBE = 1.1. Purpose Here, we introduce a novel model of proton RBE based on how a cell's intrinsic radiosensitivity varies with LET, rather than its LQM parameters. Methods and materials We performed clonogenic cell survival assays for eight cell lines exposed to 6 MV x-rays and 1.2, 2.6, or 9.9 keV/µm protons, and combined our measurements with published survival data (n = 397 total cell line/LET combinations). We characterized how radiosensitivity metrics of the form DSF%, (the dose required to achieve survival fraction [SF], e.g., D10%) varied with proton LET, and calculated the Bayesian information criteria associated with different LET-dependent functions to determine which functions best described the underlying trends. This allowed us to construct a six-parameter model that predicts cells’ proton survival curves based on the LET dependence of their radiosensitivity, rather than the LET dependence of the LQM parameters themselves. We compared the accuracy of our model to previously established empirical proton RBE models, and implemented our model within a clinical treatment plan evaluation workflow to demonstrate its feasibility in a clinical setting. Results Our analyses of the trends in the data show that DSF% is linearly correlated between x-rays and protons, regardless of the choice of the survival level (e.g., D10%, D37%, or D50% are similarly correlated), and that the slope and intercept of these correlations vary with proton LET. The model we constructed based on these trends predicts proton RBE within 15%–30% at the 68.3% confidence level and offers a more accurate general description of the experimental data than previously published empirical models. In the context of a clinical treatment plan, our model generally predicted higher RBE-weighted doses than the other empirical models, with RBE-weighted doses in the distal portion of the field being up to 50.7% higher than the planned RBE-weighted doses (RBE = 1.1) to the tumor. Conclusions We established a new empirical proton RBE model that is more accurate than previous empirical models, and that predicts much higher RBE values in the distal edge of clinical proton beams.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Fixed- versus Variable-RBE Computations for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy
    (Elsevier, 2019) Yepes, Pablo; Adair, Antony; Frank, Steven J.; Grosshans, David R.; Liao, Zhongxing; Liu, Amy; Mirkovic, Dragan; Poenisch, Falk; Titt, Uwe; Wang, Qianxia; Mohan, Radhe
    Purpose: To evaluate how using models of proton therapy that incorporate variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) versus the current practice of using a fixed RBE of 1.1 affects dosimetric indices on treatment plans for large cohorts of patients treated with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods and Materials: Treatment plans for 4 groups of patients who received IMPT for brain, head-and-neck, thoracic, or prostate cancer were selected. Dose distributions were recalculated in 4 ways: 1 with a fast-dose Monte Carlo calculator with fixed RBE and 3 with RBE calculated to 3 different models—McNamara, Wedenberg, and repair-misrepair-fixation. Differences among dosimetric indices (D02, D50, D98, and mean dose) for target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) on each plan were compared between the fixed-RBE and variable-RBE calculations. Results: In analyses of all target volumes, for which the main concern is underprediction or RBE less than 1.1, none of the models predicted an RBE less than 1.05 for any of the cohorts. For OARs, the 2 models based on linear energy transfer, McNamara and Wedenberg, systematically predicted RBE >1.1 for most structures. For the mean dose of 25% of the plans for 2 OARs, they predict RBE equal to or larger than 1.4, 1.3, 1.3, and 1.2 for brain, head-and-neck, thorax, and prostate, respectively. Systematically lower increases in RBE are predicted by repair-misrepair-fixation, with a few cases (eg, femur) in which the RBE is less than 1.1 for all plans. Conclusions: The variable-RBE models predict increased doses to various OARs, suggesting that strategies to reduce high-dose linear energy transfer in critical structures should be developed to minimize possible toxicity associated with IMPT.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Optimization of FLASH proton beams using a track-repeating algorithm
    (Wiley, 2022) Wang, Qianxia; Titt, Uwe; Mohan, Radhe; Guan, Fada; Zhao, Yao; Yang, Ming; Yepes, Pablo
    Background: Radiation with high dose rate (FLASH) has shown to reduce toxicities to normal tissues around the target and maintain tumor control with the same amount of dose compared to conventional radiation. This phenomenon has been widely studied in electron therapy, which is often used for shallow tumor treatment. Proton therapy is considered a more suitable treatment modality for deep-seated tumors. The feasibility of FLASH proton therapy has recently been demonstrated by a series of pre- and clinical trials. One of the challenges is to efficiently generate wide enough dose distributions in both lateral and longitudinal directions to cover the entire tumor volume. The goal of this paper is to introduce a set of automatic FLASH proton beam optimization algorithms developed recently. Purpose: To develop a fast and efficient optimizer for the design of a passive scattering proton FLASH radiotherapy delivery at The University of Texas MD Anderson Proton Therapy Center, based on the fast dose calculator (FDC). Methods: A track-repeating algorithm, FDC, was validated versus Geant4 simulations and applied to calculate dose distributions in various beamline setups. The design of the components was optimized to deliver homogeneous fields with well-defined diameters between 11.0 and 20.5 mm, as well as a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) with modulations between 8.5 and 39.0 mm. A ridge filter, a high-Z material scatterer, and a collimator with range compensator were inserted in the beam path, and their shapes and sizes were optimized to spread out the Bragg peak, widen the beam, and reduce the penumbra. The optimizer was developed and tested using two proton energies (87.0 and 159.5 MeV) in a variety of beamline arrangements. Dose rates of the optimized beams were estimated by scaling their doses to those of unmodified beams. Results: The optimized 87.0-MeV beams, with a distance from the beam pipe window to the phantom surface (window-to-surface distance [WSD]) of 550 mm, produced an 8.5-mm-wide SOBP (proximal 90% to distal 90% of the maximum dose); 14.5, 12.0, and 11.0-mm lateral widths at the 50%, 80%, and 90% dose location, respectively; and a 2.5-mm penumbra from 80% to 20% in the lateral profile. The 159.5-MeV beam had an SOBP of 39.0 mm and lateral widths of 20.5, 15.0, and 12.5 mm at 50%, 80%, and 90% dose location, respectively, when the WSD was 550 mm. Wider lateral widths were obtained with increased WSD. The SOBP modulations changed when the ridge filters with different characteristics were inserted. Dose rates on the beam central axis for all optimized beams (other than the 87.0-MeV beam with 2000-mm WSD) were above that needed for the FLASH effect threshold (40 Gy/s) except at the very end of the depth dose profile scaling with a dose rate of 1400 Gy/s at the Bragg peak in the unmodified beams. The optimizer was able to instantly design the individual beamline components for each of the beamline setups, without the need of time intensive iterative simulations. Conclusion: An efficient system, consisting of an optimizer and an FDC have been developed and validated in a variety of beamline setups, comprising two proton energies, several WSDs, and SOBPs. The set of automatic optimization algorithms produces beam shaping element designs efficiently and with excellent quality.