Browsing by Author "Titt, Uwe"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams
    (Elsevier, 2013) Newhauser, Wayne D.; Rechner, Laura; Mirkovic, Dragan; Yepes, Pablo; Koch, Nicholas C.; Titt, Uwe; Fontenot, Jonas D.; Zhang, Rui
    Monte Carlo simulations are increasingly used for dose calculations in proton therapy due to its inherent accuracy. However, dosimetric deviations have been found using Monte Carlo code when high density materials are present in the proton beamline. The purpose of this work was to quantify the magnitude of dose perturbation caused by metal objects. We did this by comparing measurements and Monte Carlo predictions of dose perturbations caused by the presence of small metal spheres in several clinical proton therapy beams as functions of proton beam range and drift space. Monte Carlo codes MCNPX, GEANT4 and Fast Dose Calculator (FDC) were used. Generally good agreement was found between measurements and Monte Carlo predictions, with the average difference within 5% and maximum difference within 17%. The modification of multiple Coulomb scattering model in MCNPX code yielded improvement in accuracy and provided the best overall agreement with measurements. Our results confirmed that Monte Carlo codes are well suited for predicting multiple Coulomb scattering in proton therapy beams when short drift spaces are involved.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Fixed- versus Variable-RBE Computations for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy
    (Elsevier, 2019) Yepes, Pablo; Adair, Antony; Frank, Steven J.; Grosshans, David R.; Liao, Zhongxing; Liu, Amy; Mirkovic, Dragan; Poenisch, Falk; Titt, Uwe; Wang, Qianxia; Mohan, Radhe
    Purpose: To evaluate how using models of proton therapy that incorporate variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) versus the current practice of using a fixed RBE of 1.1 affects dosimetric indices on treatment plans for large cohorts of patients treated with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods and Materials: Treatment plans for 4 groups of patients who received IMPT for brain, head-and-neck, thoracic, or prostate cancer were selected. Dose distributions were recalculated in 4 ways: 1 with a fast-dose Monte Carlo calculator with fixed RBE and 3 with RBE calculated to 3 different models—McNamara, Wedenberg, and repair-misrepair-fixation. Differences among dosimetric indices (D02, D50, D98, and mean dose) for target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) on each plan were compared between the fixed-RBE and variable-RBE calculations. Results: In analyses of all target volumes, for which the main concern is underprediction or RBE less than 1.1, none of the models predicted an RBE less than 1.05 for any of the cohorts. For OARs, the 2 models based on linear energy transfer, McNamara and Wedenberg, systematically predicted RBE >1.1 for most structures. For the mean dose of 25% of the plans for 2 OARs, they predict RBE equal to or larger than 1.4, 1.3, 1.3, and 1.2 for brain, head-and-neck, thorax, and prostate, respectively. Systematically lower increases in RBE are predicted by repair-misrepair-fixation, with a few cases (eg, femur) in which the RBE is less than 1.1 for all plans. Conclusions: The variable-RBE models predict increased doses to various OARs, suggesting that strategies to reduce high-dose linear energy transfer in critical structures should be developed to minimize possible toxicity associated with IMPT.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Optimization of FLASH proton beams using a track-repeating algorithm
    (Wiley, 2022) Wang, Qianxia; Titt, Uwe; Mohan, Radhe; Guan, Fada; Zhao, Yao; Yang, Ming; Yepes, Pablo
    Background: Radiation with high dose rate (FLASH) has shown to reduce toxicities to normal tissues around the target and maintain tumor control with the same amount of dose compared to conventional radiation. This phenomenon has been widely studied in electron therapy, which is often used for shallow tumor treatment. Proton therapy is considered a more suitable treatment modality for deep-seated tumors. The feasibility of FLASH proton therapy has recently been demonstrated by a series of pre- and clinical trials. One of the challenges is to efficiently generate wide enough dose distributions in both lateral and longitudinal directions to cover the entire tumor volume. The goal of this paper is to introduce a set of automatic FLASH proton beam optimization algorithms developed recently. Purpose: To develop a fast and efficient optimizer for the design of a passive scattering proton FLASH radiotherapy delivery at The University of Texas MD Anderson Proton Therapy Center, based on the fast dose calculator (FDC). Methods: A track-repeating algorithm, FDC, was validated versus Geant4 simulations and applied to calculate dose distributions in various beamline setups. The design of the components was optimized to deliver homogeneous fields with well-defined diameters between 11.0 and 20.5 mm, as well as a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) with modulations between 8.5 and 39.0 mm. A ridge filter, a high-Z material scatterer, and a collimator with range compensator were inserted in the beam path, and their shapes and sizes were optimized to spread out the Bragg peak, widen the beam, and reduce the penumbra. The optimizer was developed and tested using two proton energies (87.0 and 159.5 MeV) in a variety of beamline arrangements. Dose rates of the optimized beams were estimated by scaling their doses to those of unmodified beams. Results: The optimized 87.0-MeV beams, with a distance from the beam pipe window to the phantom surface (window-to-surface distance [WSD]) of 550 mm, produced an 8.5-mm-wide SOBP (proximal 90% to distal 90% of the maximum dose); 14.5, 12.0, and 11.0-mm lateral widths at the 50%, 80%, and 90% dose location, respectively; and a 2.5-mm penumbra from 80% to 20% in the lateral profile. The 159.5-MeV beam had an SOBP of 39.0 mm and lateral widths of 20.5, 15.0, and 12.5 mm at 50%, 80%, and 90% dose location, respectively, when the WSD was 550 mm. Wider lateral widths were obtained with increased WSD. The SOBP modulations changed when the ridge filters with different characteristics were inserted. Dose rates on the beam central axis for all optimized beams (other than the 87.0-MeV beam with 2000-mm WSD) were above that needed for the FLASH effect threshold (40 Gy/s) except at the very end of the depth dose profile scaling with a dose rate of 1400 Gy/s at the Bragg peak in the unmodified beams. The optimizer was able to instantly design the individual beamline components for each of the beamline setups, without the need of time intensive iterative simulations. Conclusion: An efficient system, consisting of an optimizer and an FDC have been developed and validated in a variety of beamline setups, comprising two proton energies, several WSDs, and SOBPs. The set of automatic optimization algorithms produces beam shaping element designs efficiently and with excellent quality.