Repository logo
English
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of R-3
English
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Santoso, Lie Philip"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Partisan Bias in Economic Perceptions: How Political and Economic Contexts Condition the Strength of the Partisan Screen
    (2018-04-16) Santoso, Lie Philip; Stevenson, Randolph T
    For more than 50 years, the usefulness of party identification (PID) in cross-national research has been a matter of dispute in the study of comparative political behavior. These debates are wide-ranging but boil down to how one conceptualizes the nature of PID. There are some who argued that PID is primarily a social identity while there are others who treat it simply as a political attitude. As a result, there are widespread disagreements about the stability, measurement, and applicability of the concept in comparative contexts. In this dissertation, I seek to move beyond these debates by focusing on the one aspect of PID that has reached a scholarly consensus: the function of PID as a perceptual screen through which individuals perceive realities. To do this, I first develop an individual-level theory of partisan bias drawn from a general psychological theory of motivated reasoning to formally define a “partisan screen” at the individual level. In particular, I argue that the key mechanism in which individuals develop a partisan screen is through the selective exposure to favorable information. Subsequently, I use this individual level theory to identify the contextual variables most likely to condition the strength of that screen for typical individuals in different political and economic contexts. Importantly, these factors are derived directly from my individual model of partisan bias – that is, I seek to identify the parameters of that theoretical model that can vary across contexts. This theoretical approach means that my empirical results about the impact of contexts speak directly to the veracity of the underlying individual level theory. My empirical results about the impact of these contextual variables reveal that selective exposure is indeed a key mechanism that partisans use to develop strong partisan screens in perceiving the economy. In particular, since my theory suggests that voters need to be able to identify a set of “trusted sources” that will consistently deliver a partisan message in order to develop a strong partisan screen, a key contextual variable that would explain the variation in the strength of the partisan screen needs to capture the ease to which individuals are able to identify these “trusted” sources. As such, I develop a compelling new measure of the identifiability of partisan media for different parties and different times and shows that it does have a strong causal effect on the strength of the partisan screen across contexts.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    What drives perceptions of partisan cooperation?
    (Cambridge University Press, 2024) Santoso, Lie Philip; Stevenson, Randolph T.; Weschle, Simon
    What drives voters' perceptions of partisan cooperation? In this note, we investigate whether voters have accurate beliefs about which parties regularly cooperate with one another, and whether these beliefs follow the real-time portrait of cooperation and conflict between parties that is reported in the news. We combine original survey data of voters' perceptions of party cooperation in four countries over two time periods with a measure of parties' public relationships as reported by the media. We find that voters' perceptions of cooperation and conflict among parties do reflect actual patterns of interactions. This pattern holds even after controlling for policy differences between parties as well as joint cabinet membership. Furthermore, we show that the impact of contemporary events on cooperation perceptions is most pronounced for voters who monitor the political news more carefully. Our findings have important implications for partisan cooperation and mass–elite linkages. Specifically, we find that contrary to the usual finding that voters are generally uninformed about politics, voters hold broadly accurate beliefs about the patterns of partisan cooperation, and importantly, these views track changes in relevant news. This reflects positively on the masses' capacities to infer parties' behaviors.
  • About R-3
  • Report a Digital Accessibility Issue
  • Request Accessible Formats
  • Fondren Library
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Privacy Notice
  • R-3 Policies

Physical Address:

6100 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77005

Mailing Address:

MS-44, P.O.BOX 1892, Houston, Texas 77251-1892