Browsing by Author "Crowther, Jason Everett"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Inhibition versus over-activation in word selection: Evidence from aphasia
    (2007) Crowther, Jason Everett; Martin, Randi C.
    Two nonfluent aphasic patients, ML and AR, and two fluent aphasic patients, LC and LW, along with older controls were tested on tasks involving semantic blocking and lexical selection. In Experiment 1, a repeated picture-naming task manipulating semantic blocking and presentation rate, both nonfluent patients showed growing semantic interference across trials, while the other subjects did not. In Experiment 2, a corresponding comprehension task, ML showed increasing semantic interference while AR showed a lack of repetition priming. Experiment 3 was a category fluency task in which AR performed very poorly and ML performed similarly to the fluent patients. Experiment 4 was a sentence completion task, and no evidence was found that the number or relatedness of lexical competitors caused any difficulty for the nonfluent patients. It was concluded that ML suffers from deficient semantic inhibitory mechanism while AR suffers from an under-activation of lexical representations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Mechanisms and scope of planning in language production
    (2009) Crowther, Jason Everett
    Two series of experiments were conducted in relation to the issues of how speakers select and plan linguistic representations during language production. The first was an aging and individual differences study relating performance on standard tests of executive functioning to performance on a blocked cyclic naming experiment. Few differences were found between the two age groups that could not be attributed to a decline in the speed of processing and shifting the focus of attention in the components of working memory. Combined group analyses revealed two separate processes influencing performance in the blocked cyclic naming task, with one being a proactive interference effect involving competition between items in the response set and the other being a distractor interference effect involving the intrusion of a previously presented item. The proactive interference effect was not modulated by semantic relatedness, except in the first cycle, and it was argued that this reflected competition between a set of activated lexical items, whereas the distractor interference effect was modulated by semantic relatedness, and it was argued that it was due to the persistence in the activation of a particular item after it was no longer relevant. The second series of sentence production experiments was intended to distinguish between different accounts of the scope of planning in sentence production by varying phrasal complexity and lexical variables thought to affect the ease of retrieving items at different levels of representation. Across the experiments, evidence was found, as in previous studies (e.g., Smith & Wheeldon, 1999) that the phrase is a scope of planning, as manipulations of initial phrase complexity consistently affected sentence onset latencies. However, only manipulations of the semantic properties of items interacted with phrasal complexity, whereas manipulations of lexical variables showed no such interactions. These results suggest that the phrasal scope is semantically-based (Allum & Wheeldon, 2007), and that planning involves greater processing of representations within the first phrase of the semantic level.