Chhabra, SapnaWarmflash, Aryeh2021-10-212021-10-212021Chhabra, Sapna and Warmflash, Aryeh. "BMP-treated human embryonic stem cells transcriptionally resemble amnion cells in the monkey embryo." <i>Biology Open,</i> 10, no. 9 (2021) The Company of Biologists: https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.058617.https://hdl.handle.net/1911/111587Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) possess an immense potential to generate clinically relevant cell types and unveil mechanisms underlying early human development. However, using hESCs for discovery or translation requires accurately identifying differentiated cell types through comparison with their in vivo counterparts. Here, we set out to determine the identity of much debated BMP-treated hESCs by comparing their transcriptome to recently published single cell transcriptomic data from early human embryos ( Xiang et al., 2020). Our analyses reveal several discrepancies in the published human embryo dataset, including misclassification of putative amnion, intermediate and inner cell mass cells. These misclassifications primarily resulted from similarities in pseudogene expression, highlighting the need to carefully consider gene lists when making comparisons between cell types. In the absence of a relevant human dataset, we utilized the recently published single cell transcriptome of the early post implantation monkey embryo to discern the identity of BMP-treated hESCs. Our results suggest that BMP-treated hESCs are transcriptionally more similar to amnion cells than trophectoderm cells in the monkey embryo. Together with prior studies, this result indicates that hESCs possess a unique ability to form mature trophectoderm subtypes via an amnion-like transcriptional state.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.engThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.Journal articlebio058617https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.058617