Essays on legislative and multilateral bargaining

dc.contributor.advisorEraslan, Hulyaen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMorgan, T. Cliftonen_US
dc.creatorEvdokimov, Kirillen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-23T21:26:52Zen_US
dc.date.created2022-05en_US
dc.date.issued2022-04-21en_US
dc.date.submittedMay 2022en_US
dc.date.updated2022-09-23T21:26:52Zen_US
dc.descriptionEMBARGO NOTE: This item is embargoed until 2028-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation, I present a game-theoretic analysis of three models of collective decision-making, with a particular focus on the effects of decision-making institutions on the produced outcomes. In Chapter 1, I study a model of bargaining in which an agenda-setter proposes a spatial policy to voters and can revise the initial proposal if it gets rejected. Voters can communicate with each other and have distinct but correlated preferences, which the agenda-setter is uncertain about. I investigate whether the ability to make a revised proposal is valuable to the agenda-setter. When a single acceptance is required to pass a policy, the equilibrium outcome is unique and has a screening structure. Because the preferences of voters are single-peaked, the Coase conjecture is violated and the ability to make a revised proposal is valuable. When two or more acceptances are required to pass a policy, there is an interval of the agenda-setter's equilibrium expected payoffs. The endpoints have a screening structure, leading to the same conclusions as in the case of a single acceptance. Interestingly, an increase in the required quota may allow the agenda-setter to extract more surplus from voters. In Chapter 2, I analyze a distributive model of legislative bargaining in which the surpluses generated by coalitions equal the sums of productivities of coalition members. The heterogeneous ability of players to generate surplus leads to asymmetric bargaining prospects in otherwise symmetric environments. More productive players are recruited more often by other players despite having higher expected payoffs; however, the players who are recruited in every coalition have equal expected payoffs despite having different productivity. I show that an increase in the required quota raises equality as measured by the Gini coefficient. In Chapter 3, I provide a sufficient condition for the uniqueness of equilibrium payoffs in a model of stochastic bargaining with unanimity rule and risk-averse players.en_US
dc.embargo.lift2028-05-01en_US
dc.embargo.terms2028-05-01en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationEvdokimov, Kirill. "Essays on legislative and multilateral bargaining." (2022) Diss., Rice University. <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/1911/113330">https://hdl.handle.net/1911/113330</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/113330en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author, unless otherwise indicated. Permission to reuse, publish, or reproduce the work beyond the bounds of fair use or other exemptions to copyright law must be obtained from the copyright holder.en_US
dc.subjectlegislative bargainingen_US
dc.subjectmultilateral bargainingen_US
dc.subjectpolicy bargainingen_US
dc.subjectcoase conjectureen_US
dc.subjectmonopoly agenda-controlen_US
dc.subjectequalityen_US
dc.subjectuniquenessen_US
dc.subjectstochastic surplusen_US
dc.titleEssays on legislative and multilateral bargainingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.materialTexten_US
thesis.degree.departmentEconomicsen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineSocial Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.grantorRice Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt
Size:
5.85 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
2.61 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: